Those of us in the Seattle AvGeek scene are all too familiar with Honeywell Aerospace Flight Test’s Convair 580 (reg N580HW) based at Paine Field (PAE) [where Boeing makes their 747, 767, 777 (for now) & most 787 aircraft]. The aircraft is serial number 2, it was built in 1952. It is not every day that you have the opportunity to see a 61-year-old aircraft in operational service, let alone fly on one. This was my lucky day.
Before making the drive to the “Honeywell Museum of Flight” at Paine Field, I was at Honeywell’s Redmond laboratory to partake in a demonstration of Honeywell’s advanced Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS), Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS), and landing monitoring research.
At the time, I was not sure if I would be getting a flight on the Convair of their Sabreliner (N670H). Shortly after my arrival, I was told that we would all be hopping aboard N580HW — I was thrilled, but also at the same time kind of jealous of the Sabre crew!
The Convair was purchased from Era Alaska Airlines as they were replacing their Convair 580s with smaller, cheaper Dash-8s. Era also owned one of only two certified Convair 580 simulators. All of Honeywell Flight Test’s Convair crew was trained by them, in Alaska.
Honeywell always has a few more than a dozen projects attached to their Convair, and for a test aircraft it spends a lot of time airborne — three hundred hours a year. During the summer months, they fly the plane under (and into) thunderstorms in Florida to better calibrate their brand-new flagship RDR-4000 weather radar.
Earlier this year, I had the opportunity to fly on North America’s only passenger Convair airline, Nolinor and to say the least, it was amazing. Boarding the Convair was, unsurprisingly, identical to my previous Convair experience. That, however, is about where the similarities ended.
The seating is what one would call an “executive configuration” with ample seat pitch (probably around 40 inches). It was also impressive to see the seating fabric and piping matched Honeywell’s color scheme.
As you can probably see, the aircraft also contains several work benches. These are usually configured with multiple monitors and lots of other mission-specific equipment.
The aircraft is also full of networking hardware, which makes sense, as they need some way of shuttling around the terabytes of data they generate per hour. All of these systems are capable of being powered by the aircraft’s own generators. The only difference between their Convair and others is that it carries a few more inverters.
A mostly empty work bench aboard Honeywell Flight Test’s Convair – Photo: Bernie Leighton | AirlineReporter.com
I was free to move about the cabin, so I took that to heart. More than being in a Convair or in a test aircraft, this flight was something extra special for me; I have never taken off from Paine Field.
I have hover-taxied around the PAE ramp, flown over PAE, and even landed at PAE, but I have never taken off from PAE. What a plane to have my first take off in!
Start up of the T56 engines (and I call them that because the pilots are both ex-military aviators) was another beautiful display of turning fuel into noise. Unlike Nolinor, Honeywell estimates that they only burn 330 gallons of fuel per hour – 25 gallons less than their Canadian counterpart.
Taxi was thrilling. The feeling of being in a 61-year-old aircraft going past brand new 777s and other Boeing products is surreal. Take off was the same. Since we departed via runway 34L, I could not view spotter-buddies who came out to see the show directly, but I could certainly recognize their cars. I could even see the roof of the Future of Flight. It was also a gorgeous day, even though the light was starting to fade.
Our first maneuver was to sync altimeters with the Sabreliner; this required flying in a loose formation while the two flight crews made sure they were synchronized. In the pre-flight briefing, we were told that they were not the Blue Angels and that it would be difficult to get a photograph of this scenario. They were not wrong. I can tell you that it did look beautiful, though.
The next demonstration was the TCAS. After syncing the altimeters, the Saberliner flew a thirty mile circle to set up with a head-on course. Closing at a speed of over 600kts, the Sabreliner began to show up on the multipurpose screen
The demonstration screen aboard N580HW, shown in EGPWS mode – Photo: Bernie Leighton | AirlineReporter.com
As the business jet closed on us, I walked up to the flight deck to see first-hand what it was like to induce a TCAS alert. While we never got close enough to get a photo of the aircraft, I could see the lights in the windscreen as the TCAS began lighting up.
For demonstration purposes, it was very nice to see an Resolution Advisory (RA) issued as well (i.e. how to not crash in to the other plane). Our pilots acted, and as you can tell, no one was ever in any real danger.
Next up was a test of the EGPWS, with the beautiful Olympic mountains as our demonstrator.
Without EGPWS, this would not be something you want to see – Photo: Bernie Leighton | AirlineReporter.com
Okay, so I may have been riding jumpseat by this point. How could I refuse?! This was my first jumpseat ride ever, and in a flight test Convair no less! But I needed to hear what the warnings would sound like for the pilots.
The aural cues of the EGPWS are much louder than the media would have you think, with the calls of “TERRAIN! TERRAIN!” and then “PULL UP!” extremely noticeable and surprising. I should also mention that the EGPWS system works off of Honeywell’s own terrain database and it is updated regularly.
After taking a run at the Olympics, and living, it was time to head back to Paine Field for our last demonstration – a brief look at Honeywell’s landing performance monitoring system. Some of these features are already offered in Honeywell’s RAAS product, but there are plenty of new features coming that I will discuss in an upcoming article.
An intentionally unstable and long approach to demonstrate Honeywell’s landing system Photo by Bernie Leighton | AirlineReporter.com
After a go-around, we landed back at PAE. It is amazing how much you can show off with only 49 minutes in the air.
Honeywell’s pilots are extremely professional and skilled; I cannot stress this enough. They were great people to speak with, and even better people to demonstrate Honeywell technology.
Before I drove back home, it was time to check out the Honeywell Museum of Flight properly.
The hangar was very well kept, clean and a testament to efficient use of space.
Honeywell even uses towbar-less tugs (identical to those used by American Eagle) for their flight test jet.
Honeywell keeps a Eurocopter around for any heli-borne testing they may need.
Lastly, it was time to take a look at their Beech King Air C-90, of 1971 vintage, that one of the Flight Test Engineers refers to as his girlfriend — whom am I to argue?
I would like to give a huge thank you to Honeywell and Honeywell flight test for making this day possible. It was an amazing experience and I learned more about avionics in one day than most people ever will!
Stay tuned for my next post which will go way more into technical details about what I learned.
Bernie Leighton – Managing Correspondent Bernie has traveled around the world to learn about, experience & photograph different types of planes. Bernie will go anywhere to fly on anything. He spent four years in Australia learning about how to run an airline, while putting his learning into practice by mileage running around the world. You can usually find Bernie in his natural habitat: an airport. @PowerToTheThird | Flickr |
Our Other Airline Stories
- Day of the Turbine (Part 4): The Nolinor Hangar
- Day of the Turbine (Part 1): Flying on the Convair 580
- Epic AvGeek Photo: Making the Huge Boeing Dreamlifter Look Small
- VIP Tour of TAM Airlines’ New First Class on a Boeing 777-300ER
- Day of the Turbine (Part 2): The Original King Air
- Day of the Turbine (Part 3): The Fairchild Metroliner 23
No comments:
Post a Comment